Auction catalogs offer information valuable to researchers which is rarely found in other contexts. First, they provide an up-to-date price valuation for objects, based on the current art market. This is valuable to museums, private individuals, and other institutions who may be interested in purchasing work or in estimating the value of their own similar pieces. Secondly, these catalogs offer a glimpse into unusual and rarely seen works, such as "art that has been held in private hands and is coming onto the market for the first time in decades or centuries" (Robinson 24). In addition, these catalogs provide high-quality images, useful for museum reference and university Visual Resource Collections alike.
Libraries are faced with a couple challenges when collecting these print materials: their expense and their frequency of publication. Because auction houses can release hundreds of catalogs a year, it is tempting to subscribe to these resources much like serials. A single auction catalog, however, is not inexpensive; currently print catalogs from Skinner, according to their website, can be purchased for $34 each. Therefore, art librarians must prioritize these catalogs based on their own museum's collection, faculty or curatorial preference, or corresponding university curricula, much like their collection development policy for monographs would be.
Online resources exist, as well. Most of the major auction houses provide extensive online searchabiliy and browsabilty, coinciding with the growth of online auctions. Both auction results and, often, viewable catalogs are available online through their respective websites. Christie's, for example, provides auction results dating back to 1998. In addition, a number of online databases and indexes have been developed to help researchers sort through the vast quantities of information in these catalogs. OCLC has created and maintains an extensive database (SCIPIO) of over 300,000 auction catalogs dating back to the 16th century. In terms of indexes, "two standard and long-established names in the field are Enrique Mayer's International Auction Records and Duncan Hislop's Art Sales Index," the biggest difference between the two being that "Art Sales Index demands and higher sale price in order for an item to be recorded" (Robinson 26). Often, these indexes and others may be specific to one medium or perhaps only cover the most "important" sales, so researchers may want to consult several in order to find adequate information.
Works Cited
Robinson, Lee. "Auction Catalogs And Indexes As Reference Tools." Art Documentation: Bulletin Of The Art Libraries Society Of North America 18.1 (1999): 24-28. Art Full Text (H.W. Wilson). Web. 24 Sept. 2013.
McNulty, Tom. "A Subject Classification System For Auction House Sales Catalogues Based On The Getty Trust's Art And Architecture Thesaurus." Art Documentation: Bulletin Of The Art Libraries Society Of North America 11.(1992): 185-187. Art Full Text (H.W. Wilson). Web. 28 Sept. 2013.




